The American Nurses
Association (ANA) is giving an ethics award to a US Navy nurse who refused to
force-feed Guantanamo prisoners through a tube.
This contravenes Department of
Defense policy that indicate the
practice of force-feeding the prisoners is, according to the article, “legal,
appropriate and ‘medically sound’”, making the nurse’s actions doubly important
– he was disobeying orders by not doing the force feeding. Unlike a civilian hospital job, where he
might be fired and simply go to another hospital, the nurse was facing a court
martial for his actions and the likelihood of losing his chance at military
retirement. And a court martial can also
result in a discharge that is other than honorable, making employment in the
civilian world difficult, loss of wages and possibly time in the brig. Certainly, the nurse risked a great deal by
not following orders.
But is force feeding
unethical?
According to the American Medical Association (AMA), in a 2013 letter to the Secretary of Defense, stated that force feeding of prisoners “violates the core ethical values of the medical profession. Every competent patient has the right to refuse medical intervention, including life-sustaining interventions.” (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/694196-hunger-strikers-letter-04-25-13.html)
According to the American Medical Association (AMA), in a 2013 letter to the Secretary of Defense, stated that force feeding of prisoners “violates the core ethical values of the medical profession. Every competent patient has the right to refuse medical intervention, including life-sustaining interventions.” (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/694196-hunger-strikers-letter-04-25-13.html)
The letter goes on to
endorse the World Medical Association Declaration of Tokyo, which makes the
same point, showing that there are international standards that should be
applied and these standards say that a competent patient should have agency on
refusal of being fed.
But regarding Guantanamo
prisoners; if we let them starve then we make them martyrs to their cause, right?
Well, force-feeding them also brings
attention to their cause like martyrdom would, and makes the US seem barbaric
in our treatment.
But how can letting
them die be ethical? Well, letting them make decisions on their own death
has more dignity than stopping it via the cruel and unusual practice of forcing
a tube down their throat strapped to a chair.
Neither choice is preferable, but they do have an opportunity to make
that penultimate decision, vice taking it away – and giving them that agency is more ethical than taking it away.
No comments:
Post a Comment